submit a book review of 1,000 words in current APA format. Choose 1 chapter and write an in-depth review of the chapter you choose. Discuss 1 or 2 main points with which you agree and 1 or 2 with which you do not agree, supporting your thoughts with well-reasoned arguments. Your analysis must also be supported by at least 3 sources other than the Grudem book, and by biblical principles. Each additional source must be cited in-text and in a reference list in current APA format. This review will be evaluated based on the grading rubric provided.
*** Chapter and Rubric is attached***
BUSI 301
| Criteria | Levels of Achievement | Points Earned | |||
| Content | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present | |
| Substantive Analysis | 63 to 70 pointsThe text is critically reviewed (not simply described). Major points of agreement and disagreement are stated clearly and supported by thoughtful analysis. At least 3 scholarly sources other than the reviewed book are properly referenced, cited, and integrated into the analysis.At least 2 separate Bible passages are fully integrated in the analysis. | 49 to 62 pointsThe text is critically reviewed (not simply described). Major points of agreement and disagreement are stated clearly and supported by thoughtful analysis. At least 3 scholarly sources are referenced and cited, including the textbook, but may not be fully integrated into the analysis. At least 2 Bible passages are included, but are not fully integrated into the analysis. | 1 to 48 pointsThe text is described, but not reviewed. Major points of agreement and disagreement are omitted, or not stated clearly and supported by thoughtful analysis. Fewer than 3 scholarly sources are used, or are not integrated into the analysis. Fewer than 2 Bible passages are included, with little or no integration. | 0 pointsEssential questions of the assignment are not answered, and/or Analysis fails to include scholarly sources and Biblical worldview integration. | |
| Completeness and Relevant Issues | 18 to 20 pointsThe majority of the concepts in the text are noted and included in the analysis. Student analyzes 1 or 2 major points with which the student disagrees. | 14 to 17 pointsMany of the concepts in the text are noted and included in the analysis.Student analyzes at least 1 major point with which the student disagrees. | 1 to 13 pointsSignificant concepts presented in the text are omitted.Student fails to analyze any points of disagreement. | 0 pointsThere is no critical analysis of the concepts in the text. | |
| Structure | Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present | |
| Grammar and Spelling | 14 to 16 pointsCorrect spelling and grammar are used throughout the paper. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. | 11 to 13 pointsThere are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. | 1 to 10 pointsThere are 6–10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. | 0 pointsThere are more than 10 errors in the grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content, and/or evidence of a complete lack of spell-checking or proofreading. | |
| APA Format Compliance | 14 to 16 pointsThere are 0–2 minor errors in APA format in the required items: title page, running head, page numbers, headings, in-text citations, and references. All required items are present. | 11 to 13 pointsThere are 3-5 minor errors in APA format in the required items. All required items are present. | 1 to 10 pointsThere are more than 5 errors in APA format in the required items and/or required items are missing. | 0 pointsCitations and required items demonstrate no APA structure and required items are missing. | |
| Word Count | 8 pointsThe minimum word count of 1000 words of substantive content is met or exceeded. | 6 to 7 pointsSubstantive word count is between 800 and 1000 words. | 1 to 5 pointsSubstantive word count is between 500 and 800 words. | 0 pointsThere are fewer than 500 words of substantive content. |
Page 2 of 2
